<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss PUBLIC "-//Netscape Communications//DTD RSS 0.91//EN" "http://my.netscape.com/publish/formats/rss-0.91.dtd">
<rss version="0.91">
	<channel>
		<language>en_GB</language>
		<title>16/02/2007: Re: Is there an Evolutionist in the house ???!</title>
		<link>http://tobyinkster.co.uk/blog/2007/02/16/evolution/</link>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Dave in Lake Villa wrote:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Could someone please tell me how Evolutionists/Atheists respond to these please ?  Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;1. Nothing produced something which then exploded its matter and out of that came personality, abstract thoughts, rationale, intuition, love, hate, discernment and even believe in a personal Creator.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You appear to be asking about the Big Bang. Firstly, this has nothing to do with the theory of evolution by natural selection: the universe was not created through a process of natural selection, but by the laws of physics.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For example, if I kick a ball, it keeps going in the same direction until something (a wall; gravity; friction; etc) changes its path. Similarly, if you set a star moving in a particular direction, it will keep going until it collides with another star or its path is changed by the gravity of some massive object. Simple laws of physics: testable, observable, widely accepted as fact.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Tracing the ball&amp;#8217;s path backwards, you find my foot. Tracing&amp;#8230;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<item>
			<title>Comment 001</title>
			<link>http://tobyinkster.co.ukhttp://tobyinkster.co.uk/blog/2007/02/16/evolution/comments#comment1</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;qktxgfh jgotbiaml yhsb knfghxqw meyu towcqdx vbpm&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;comment_credits&quot;&gt;
	&lt;span class=&quot;author line&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Author (Unverified):&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.qvgsrj.jdysqmt.com&quot;&gt;urdcs vkcfmoe&lt;/a&gt; &lt;span class=&quot;ip&quot;&gt;[82.179.20.35]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
	&lt;span class=&quot;date line&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Date:&lt;/strong&gt; Friday, 10th August 2007, 7:56pm (UTC)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Comment 002</title>
			<link>http://tobyinkster.co.ukhttp://tobyinkster.co.uk/blog/2007/02/16/evolution/comments#comment2</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Your answer to question 1) is fundamentally flawed and utterly inadequate - you talk about a previous universe, a parent universe, an expansion&amp;#8230;. where did &lt;strong&gt;these&lt;/strong&gt; things come from? What expanded? The thing is, atheistic views of the beginnings of the universe suffer from exactly the same criticism by way of a question levelled at theists - what created the first entity that existed?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Atheists seem to think they&amp;#8217;ve won the argument by posing the question &amp;#8216;who created God?&amp;#8217;, but it can equally be turned on it&amp;#8217;s head - if we accept, as most right thinking people do that everything has a beginning, how did &amp;#8216;nothing&amp;#8217; become &amp;#8216;something&amp;#8217; in the very first instance? You haven&amp;#8217;t explained that.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;comment_credits&quot;&gt;
	&lt;span class=&quot;author line&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Author:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://tobyinkster.co.uk/~anonymous/&quot;&gt;Anonymous Coward&lt;/a&gt; &lt;span class=&quot;ip&quot;&gt;[62.31.19.239]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
	&lt;span class=&quot;date line&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Date:&lt;/strong&gt; Thursday, 13th September 2007, 4:38pm (UTC)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
