<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss PUBLIC "-//Netscape Communications//DTD RSS 0.91//EN" "http://my.netscape.com/publish/formats/rss-0.91.dtd">
<rss version="0.91">
	<channel>
		<language>en_GB</language>
		<title>Articles Tagged with &quot;Atheism&quot;</title>
		<link>http://tobyinkster.co.uk/tag/atheism/</link>
		<description></description>
		<item>
			<title>20/02/2007: Re: A treatise on how religious Atheism is</title>
			<link>http://tobyinkster.co.uk/blog/2007/02/20/atheist-ethics/</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;TomP wrote:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;[Atheists] do not believe in the existence of a soul.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Although most Buddhists do not believe in any gods, and can therefore be described as atheists, they most certainly do believe in the concept of a soul&amp;nbsp;&amp;#8212; indeed, a soul that can continue to exist after death.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;You do not believe in any source for ethical conduct except sources within human beings&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There have been several good ethical theories put forward that go further than &amp;#8220;look within yourself and you&amp;#8217;ll know what&amp;#8217;s right&amp;#8221;. Arguably, the two that seem to gel best with current observed human ethics are Kantian ethics and Utilitarianism.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Kantian ethics look at the means rather than the ends.&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;We ask, should one do X?&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;We imagine a world where everyone does X.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Is this world flawed?&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;If so, one should never do X.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;If not, one may do X.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;



&lt;p&gt;That is, if we want to know whether it is morally acceptable to lie, we imagine a world where everyone lied all the time. Nobody would be able to get anything done in such a world. (Imagine a&amp;#8230;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>16/02/2007: Re: Is there an Evolutionist in the house ???!</title>
			<link>http://tobyinkster.co.uk/blog/2007/02/16/evolution/</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Dave in Lake Villa wrote:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Could someone please tell me how Evolutionists/Atheists respond to these please ?  Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;1. Nothing produced something which then exploded its matter and out of that came personality, abstract thoughts, rationale, intuition, love, hate, discernment and even believe in a personal Creator.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You appear to be asking about the Big Bang. Firstly, this has nothing to do with the theory of evolution by natural selection: the universe was not created through a process of natural selection, but by the laws of physics.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For example, if I kick a ball, it keeps going in the same direction until something (a wall; gravity; friction; etc) changes its path. Similarly, if you set a star moving in a particular direction, it will keep going until it collides with another star or its path is changed by the gravity of some massive object. Simple laws of physics: testable, observable, widely accepted as fact.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Tracing the ball&amp;#8217;s path backwards, you find my foot. Tracing&amp;#8230;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
