<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss PUBLIC "-//Netscape Communications//DTD RSS 0.91//EN" "http://my.netscape.com/publish/formats/rss-0.91.dtd">
<rss version="0.91">
	<channel>
		<language>en_GB</language>
		<title>Articles Tagged with &quot;Dumb&quot;</title>
		<link>http://tobyinkster.co.uk/tag/dumb/</link>
		<description></description>
		<item>
			<title>18/02/2008: Insane</title>
			<link>http://tobyinkster.co.uk/blog/2008/02/18/insane/</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Mohamed Al Fayed has gone beyond the improbable to the truly &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7250002.stm&quot;&gt;insane&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>13/04/2007: BBC News Roundup</title>
			<link>http://tobyinkster.co.uk/blog/2007/04/13/bone/</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Scientists produce sperm from bone (no sniggering at the back) and teen trashes house.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>12/04/2007: The Way Bureaucracies Work</title>
			<link>http://tobyinkster.co.uk/blog/2007/04/12/bureaucracies/</link>
			<description>
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;In 1950, publish a comprehensive set of rules.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;In 1974, publish a note which adds a few more rules and rescinds several of the old one.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;In 1981, publish a note which adjusts one of the &lt;strong&gt;conditions&lt;/strong&gt; for the a particular rule given in the 1974 note but doesn&amp;#8217;t otherwise rescind it.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;In 1987, publish a note which entirely replaces the 1974 note, not incorporating the changes of the 1981 note, although not rescinding it either.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;In 1992, publish a guidebook purporting to &amp;#8220;summarise&amp;#8221; the rules so far, but which actually contradicts the rules in several places. It must be full of pretty pictures.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;In 1993, an internal briefing establishes more rules, but these are never publically published.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;In 1994, publish a note that adjusts the conditions for rule #2 in last year&amp;#8217;s internal briefing, but without restating what rule #2 was.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;In 1997, publish a note rescinding the 1981 note.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;In 1998, reprint the 1992 guide without edits.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;In 1999, compile a full and comprehensive set of all the rules so far. Only&amp;#8230;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>10/04/2007: THIS IS TRUE</title>
			<link>http://tobyinkster.co.uk/blog/2007/04/10/this-is-true/</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;caps&quot;&gt;PLEASE DON&amp;#8217;T READ THIS.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
In 1876, a young girl named Jenn was walking down a river, an insane man killed her by stabbing her in the back, raping her, and then hanging her in his closet. Then a she just dissapeared no one ever found her untill 2000 when a yoing girl called Mary found her body and markings on her chest saying: &amp;#8220;I wasnt pretty enough&amp;#8221;. Now that you have read this message, she will come to your house on a full moon and steal your soul unless you follow these directions: Paste this message into 3 comments and press &lt;span class=&quot;caps&quot;&gt;ALT&lt;/span&gt; F4 and your crushes name will appear on the screen!!! its soo wierd&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;More insane ramblings here:&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.elsewhere.org/journal/archives/2007/03/19/youtube-chain-letters/&quot; title=&quot;THIS IS TRUE&quot;&gt;YouTube chain letters&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reelpopblog.com/2007/03/chain_letters_i.html&quot;&gt;Chain letters in YouTube comments&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Youtube_Hoax/Chain_letter_comments&quot;&gt;Wikipedia: Youtube Hoax/Chain letter comments&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

</description>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
