<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss PUBLIC "-//Netscape Communications//DTD RSS 0.91//EN" "http://my.netscape.com/publish/formats/rss-0.91.dtd">
<rss version="0.91">
	<channel>
		<language>en_GB</language>
		<title>Articles Tagged with &quot;Networking&quot;</title>
		<link>http://tobyinkster.co.uk/tag/networking/</link>
		<description></description>
		<item>
			<title>23/04/2007: London Goes Wi-Fi</title>
			<link>http://tobyinkster.co.uk/blog/2007/04/23/london-wifi/</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_London&quot;&gt;square mile&lt;/a&gt; now has &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/6577307.stm&quot;&gt;Wi-Fi&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;em&gt;The Cloud&lt;/em&gt;, as it is called, is to be free for the first month, but after that there will be a charge.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Contrast this with the proposed &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Francisco_Municipal_Wireless&quot;&gt;San Francisco Municipal Wireless scheme&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;em&gt;the Cloud&lt;/em&gt; starts to look fairly weak. In contrast with London&amp;#8217;s single square mile of coverage, the San Francisco scheme will cover a much larger area, and will be provided free of cost to the end user.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Compared to what they&amp;#8217;re rolling out in San Francisco, and many other US cities for that matter, &lt;em&gt;the Cloud&lt;/em&gt; is just a glorified version of what&amp;#8217;s already running in every coffee house in South East England.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>nmap-services</title>
			<link>http://tobyinkster.co.uk/article/nmap/</link>
			<description>====&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The following is an nmap-services file that can be used in conjuction with nmap to hunt for viruses on a network. It can&amp;#8217;t find all viruses &amp;#8212; only those ones that open a &lt;span class=&quot;caps&quot;&gt;TCP &lt;/span&gt;or &lt;span class=&quot;caps&quot;&gt;UDP &lt;/span&gt;port as a backdoor &amp;#8212; so only use it as &lt;strong&gt;a small part&lt;/strong&gt; of the overall defense for your network. I won&amp;#8217;t bother explaining how to use it &amp;#8212; if you don&amp;#8217;t know how then you probably shouldn&amp;#8217;t be using it. It could potentially be used for good or evil. I use it for the former.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;pre&gt;# List of ports used by malware
#&lt;br&gt;
# Note: some of these have legitimate uses too. These are given&lt;br&gt;
# as [bracketed] comments where known.&lt;br&gt;
#&lt;br&gt;
# Also, tonnes of trojans use common ports such as 21, 25, 80, etc.&lt;br&gt;
# I have generally left these out as they&amp;#8217;ll result in tonnes of&lt;br&gt;
# false-positives.

&lt;p&gt;Blaster         69/udp  # [tftp]&lt;br&gt;
Sobig          995/udp  #&lt;br&gt;
Sobig          996/udp  #&lt;br&gt;
Sobig          997/udp  #&lt;br&gt;
Sobig          998/udp  #&lt;br&gt;
Sobig          999/udp  #&lt;br&gt;
MyDoom        1080/tcp  # bugbear, [some proxies]&lt;br&gt;
Ultor        &amp;#8230;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
