Articles Tagged with “Validation”
19/09/2005: On Custom DTDs
Dylan Parry wrote:
Of course, but validating against a custom, non-standards controlled DTD is a complete waste of time for HTML. That would be validation for validation’s sake. If you can’t validate against a recognised doctype then there is truly no point in attempting to create your own to cover your problems
Using a custom DTD can be very useful.
19/10/2003: On Web Design
local wrote:
Now I wonder how important cross-browser coding actually is. How many browsers do I have to test, which versions?
I have two philosophies on this question.
The first is the philosophy I apply when making my own website — I stick to the standards and let any browser that can’t handle it be damned. If 99% of browsers don’t work on it, that’s fine by me. (OK, so I have added a few little workarounds for IE6, but nothing major)
The second philosophy is similar and is what I use for other people’s websites. Again, write to standards, but make sure it works more or less perfectly in:
- IE 5+ (Windows)
- Netscape 6+
- Opera 7+
- Konqueror
and make sure the content is readable and the site is navigatable in:
- Netscape 4.x
- IE 4 (Win)
- IE 5 (Mac)
- Opera 5+
- Lynx
Now, the best way to do this, is to follow my smiple (sic) 7 point design
procedure:
1. Content
Start with the content. It may be cliche to say so nowadays, but content really is king.
2. Markup
Mark up the content…