<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss PUBLIC "-//Netscape Communications//DTD RSS 0.91//EN" "http://my.netscape.com/publish/formats/rss-0.91.dtd">
<rss version="0.91">
	<channel>
		<language>en_GB</language>
		<title>Articles Tagged with &quot;W3c&quot;</title>
		<link>http://tobyinkster.co.uk/tag/w3c/</link>
		<description></description>
		<item>
			<title>21/05/2007: The Tao of HTML 5 - Part II</title>
			<link>http://tobyinkster.co.uk/blog/2007/05/21/html5/</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Part of the problem with the &lt;a href=&quot;http://whatwg.org&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;caps&quot;&gt;WHATWG&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;caps&quot;&gt;HTML&lt;/span&gt; 5 specification&lt;/a&gt; is that it&amp;#8217;s primarily written by browser makers. (&lt;a href=&quot;http://hixie.ch&quot;&gt;Hixie&lt;/a&gt;, its editor, is the exception, as he currently works for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com&quot;&gt;Google&lt;/a&gt;, though in the past was employed by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mozilla.org&quot;&gt;the Mozilla Foundation&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opera.com&quot;&gt;Opera&lt;/a&gt;.)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This has steered the focus of the specification towards browser manufacturers&amp;nbsp;&amp;#8212; the specification includes such things as algorithms for parsing markup. To expect a typical document author to &lt;strong&gt;care&lt;/strong&gt; about such details, let alone &lt;strong&gt;understand&lt;/strong&gt; them is a triumph of optimism over sanity.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;Understanding Motivations&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The aim of most browser makers is to increase their market share&amp;nbsp;&amp;#8212; to attract users, the browser must enable them to view any documents they could in their old browser, plus tempt the user with an array of new features and improvements. Naturally this leads to a situation where browsers are&amp;#8230;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>15/04/2007: The Tao of HTML 5</title>
			<link>http://tobyinkster.co.uk/blog/2007/04/15/html5/</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;On the 10th of June 1215, the a group of English barons invaded London and five days later forced &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_of_England&quot;&gt;King John&lt;/a&gt; to attach his seal to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magna_Carta&quot;&gt;Magna Carta&lt;/a&gt; in Runnymede, on the border of modern-day Sussex and Berkshire. (In those days it was customary to attach ones seal to an agreement rather than sign it. However the fact that it was not signed has led to a popular misconception that &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_of_England#Alleged_illiteracy&quot;&gt;King John was illiterate&lt;/a&gt;, when in fact he was not.)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The Magna Carta was a key document in English constitutional law, establishing certain rights (such as &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/4329839.stm&quot;&gt;habeas corpus&lt;/a&gt;) for the King&amp;#8217;s subjects, and limiting the rights of the King; importantly, requiring the King to obey &amp;#8220;the law of the land&amp;#8221;. The Magna Carta is widely regarded as a major influence on world constitutional law, and in particular greatly influenced the &amp;#8220;United States&amp;#8230;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>20/02/2007: Re: Views on XHTML 1.1 site</title>
			<link>http://tobyinkster.co.uk/blog/2007/02/20/xhtml-11/</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;The upcoming revision to the &lt;span class=&quot;caps&quot;&gt;XHTML&lt;/span&gt; 1.1 spec gets savaged on Usenet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
